IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44984 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2024 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Raja Chaudhary @ Raja Kumar Chaudhary S/o Saroj Chaudhary R/o Village - Bharwari, P.S. - Rosera, Dist. - Samastipur. 2. Saroj Chaudhary late bale chaudhary alias vale choudhary vill bharwari ps rosera dist samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, on 08.10.2024 at about 10 PM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came and started demolishing balcony of the informant and upon protest, the accused persons assaulted son and wife of the informant. Petitioner no. 1 is alleged to have assaulted the son of informant with khanti and petitioner no. 2 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44984 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 assaulted on the head of the wife of informant by means of iron rod. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Due to petty dispute, altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Injury, allegedly, caused by petitioner no. 1 is simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail application and submits that petitioner no. 2 assaulted the wife of informant with iron rod and doctor has found the injury to be grievous. 6. In view of the fact that petitioner no. 2 caused grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 2 is refused. 7. However, considering the nature of accusation and injury, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner no. 1 is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44984 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P. S. Case No. 239 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. 8. Accordingly, the bail application stands disposed of. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T