Kalai Kumar v. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/12997/2026 · 2026-05-14
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26829 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26829 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 Kalai Kumar S/o.Haridoss, No.79, Kannadasan Nagar, Therovy Village, Thiruvallur District. ..Petitioner Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police Pathirvedu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Crime No. 88/2026. ..Respondent To enlarge the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest concerned in Crime No. 88 of 2026, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Pathirvedu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vetrivel For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner / Accused-3, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of B.N.S. in connection with the case in Crime No.88 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 05.05.2026, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint with the respondent police alleging that the petitioner and others were illegally transported 2 units of sand without any valid licence. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed on him and he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), reiterated the prosecution case and would submit that the petitioner has no previous case pending against him and the respondent police has seized one unit of sand. Hence, he strongly opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the trivial nature of the offence and taking into account the fact that the petitioner has no previous case, and the quantity of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 contraband, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain conditions. 7.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gumudipoondi on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation by the respondent police. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 14-05-2026 nl Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2.
All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi. 2.The Inspector of Police Pathirvedu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 P.DHANABAL, J. nl CRL OP No. 12997 of 2026 14-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis