Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43012 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2024 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sapna Kumari W/o Kishun Kumar @ Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar R/o vill - Chandauli, P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur, at present Sapna Kumari, D/o Manoj Poddar, R/o Mohalla - Kuraich Mahavir Sthan, Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram (Town), Distt.- Rohtas, R/o vill - Bhirha, P.S.- Rosera, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Kishun Kumar @ Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar S/o Suresh Podar @ Suresh Poddar R/o vill - Chandauli, P.S.- Tajpur, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Hussamuddin Azad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 22-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. This application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no. 02 vide order dated 17.03.2026 passed by the SDJM, Rohtas at Sasaram arising out of Complaint Case No. 275 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the D.P. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons are said to have assaulted the petitioner for demand of dowry.
4. I have perused the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party nos. 2 and do not find any error in the said
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43012 of 2026(3) dt.22-07-2026 2/2
order. Further, the petitioner has not been able to show any good ground to interfere with the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party nos. 2. Hence, no ground for cancellation of bail is made out.
5. Accordingly, this cancellation bail application is rejected. However, the SDJM, Rohtas at Sasaram is directed to conclude the trial of the accused persons arising out of Complaint Case No. 275 of 2024 within six months from today and will file a compliance report in this Court after six months.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas through FAX for its compliance.
Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U