1 CGHC010230322022 2026:CGHC:28433 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3222 of 2022 1 - Manbodh Ram S/o Shri Dhan Sai Aged About 55 Years Occupation Service (Posted As Conveyor Operator, Category- Iv, N. E. I. S. 92300284, Rehar Underground Mines, District Surajpur (C.G.), R/o Village- Kharsura, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - South Eastern Coal Field Limited Through Chairman- Cum- Managing Director, Head Office, Seepat Road, Bialspur, Revenue And Civil District, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - South Eastern Coal Field Limited Through Chief General Manager (Bishrampur Area), Tehsil And District, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub Area Manager, (Rehar Gayatri Underground Mines) Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Regional Personnel Manager, S. E. C. L. (Rehar Gayatri Underground Mines),, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Manager (Mines) (Rehar Gayatri Underground Mines), Surajpur,, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Kumari Kaushalya Signh, D/o Late Ransai, Aged About 29 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village- Kaskela, Post Karwa, Police Station Jainagar Tehsil And District Surajpur,, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 2 to 6 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, Advocate along with Mr. Ajay Kumar Sahu, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/07/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Suitable Writ (s), Order (s), Direction (S), by quashing the entire proceeding (Annexure P/1) and also the order (s) (Annexure Case No. P-1) passed in 201509261200025/B-121/2014-15, by the respondent no. 1 and to issue a suitable writ in the nature of prohibition for preventing an order or decision being made which if made would be subject to certiorari. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respondents authorities for its kind perusal. 10.3 Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat