APHC010653252022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 393/2023 Between: 1. CHENGI SRINIVASULU, S/O.MAHESWARAM AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC.DRIVER IN 0/O.DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICE NELLORE ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/S SHRIRAM CHITS PVT LTD, BRANCH-1,NELLORE REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER/FOREMAN SK.KHADAR BASHA S/O.MASTHAN 2. P SRIDHAR KUMAR, S/O.VEERARAGAHAVULU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D.NO.08/08, PLOT NO.34, MANUMASIDDI NAGAR, NELLORE 3. THE MEDICAL OFFICER, THE PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER VEPINAPI, RAPUR (M) SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the Order dated 29.07.2022 passed in E.P.No. 2 24 of 2022 in D.P.No. 74 of 2017, on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge's Court, Nellore IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to CONDONE the delay of 17 days in filing the present CRP against the order dated 29.07.2022 in E.P.No.24 of 2022 in D.P.No.74 of 2017, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge's Court, Nellore and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to STAY all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 29.07.2022 in E.P.No.24 of 2022 in D.P.No.74 of 2017, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge's Court, Nellore and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V B SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR The Court made the following order: In spite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. On 19.01.2026, learned counsel for the respondents stated that the matter has been settled out of the Court and nothing remains for adjudication. 3 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02.02.2026 ANS 4 237 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 393/2023 Date: 02.02.2026 ANS