APHC010317742009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION Nos.: 22067 & 25788/2009 WRIT PETITION NO: 22067/2009 Between: 1. A.GANGAIAH, KADAPA DISTRICT & 4 OTHERS, S/O.BALA GANGANNA ERSTWHILE ATTENDER DISTRICT COURT KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 2. G.SUREKHA, W/O.NAGENDRA KUMAR REDDY ERSTWHILE ATTENDER EXCISE COURT KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 3. P.NAGESWARAMMA, W/O.MUTHYALAIAH ERSTWHILE CLASS IV MASALCHI SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE`S COURT, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 4. B.SUJATHA, W/O.B.RAVI ERSTWHILE CLASS IV MASALCHI II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 5. B.PENCHALAMMA, W/O.LATE B.SUBRAHMANYAM ERSTWHILE CLASS IV MASALCHI SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE`S COURT PRODDATUR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF AP 3 OTHERS, HYDERABAD 2. THE REGISTRAR VIGILANCE HIGH COURT OF AP, HYDERABAD 3. APPOINTING AUTHORITY DISTRICT JUDGE KADAPA DISTRICT, HYDERABAD 2 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.Nos.22067 & 25788 of 2009 4. THE DISTRICT TREASURE OFFICER KADAPA DISTRICT, D/O. P. NAGABHUSHANAM HOUSEWIFE R/O. KONETI MITTA MULAPET, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ direction or order particularly one in the writ of mandamus declaring the Termination order dated 18.12.2006 issued by the 3rd respondent in pursuantr to the proceedings vide D.O.Lr.1706/2006 dated 22.11.2006 of 2nd respondent by recourse to Act 2 to 94 is quite arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory besides subversive of ARticles, 14,16,19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and to quash the said impugned order dated 18.12.2006 passed by the 3rd respondent and consequently pass such other order or orders as the Hon`ble Court deems fit and proper to meet ends of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 28662 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Termination order dated 18.12.2006 passed by the 3rd respondent by continuing the petitioners to their respective posts or at least in the initial appointment as Scavengers/Masalachines as the case may be pending disposal of above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2009(WPMP 115067 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 28344 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to pay the Salaries of the Petitioners for the duty periods as shown in the Annexure-I, pending disposal of the Writ petition in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 28275 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the dismissed for default order DT: 05-06-2014 in WPMP No. 28344 of 2012 in W.P,No.22067 of 2009 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2014(WPMP 123578 OF 2014 3 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.Nos.22067 & 25788 of 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. PARTHASARADHY ACHUTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S S.NAGESWARAREDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 25788/2009 Between: 1. P.BHASKAR, KADAPA DISTRICT & 2 OTHERS, S/O.SUBBANNA ERSTWHILE PROCESS SERVER, DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, KADAPA DIST. 2. C.V. JANARDHANA RAO,, S/O/ LATE. RAMA SUBBA RAO ERSTWHILE PROCESS SERVER, JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, RAJAMPET, KADAPA DIST. 3. BAKKE SANTHAMMA,, W/O. NAGA RAJU NAIK ERSTWHILE ATTENDER, ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, RAYACHOTI, KADAPA DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE REGSITRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF AP 3 OTHERS, HIGH COURT OF A.P. HYDERABAD. 2. THE REGISTRAR VIGILENCE, HIGH COURT OF A.P. HYDERABAD. 3. APPOINTING AUTHORITY DISTRICT JUDGE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT TREASURE OFFICER, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, direction or order particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus declaring the Termination Order, Dt: 18-12-06 issued by the 3rd Respondent in pursuant to the Proceedings Vide D.O.Lr.No.1706/06, Dt: 22- 11-06 of 2nd Respondent by recourse to Act 2 of 94 is quite arbitrary, illegal discrminatory besides subversive of Article 14, 16, 19 & 21 of the Constitution 4 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.Nos.22067 & 25788 of 2009 of India and principles of natural justice and to quash the said impugned order, Dt: 18-12-2006 passed by the 3rd Respondent and consequently pass IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 33582 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Termination order dated 18.12.2006 passed by the 3rd respondent by continuing the petitioners to their respective posts or at least in the initial appointment as Scavengers/Masalchies as the case may be pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2009(WPMP 115064 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 28093 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 3 and 4 to pay the Salaries of the Petitioners for the duty periods as shown in the Annexure-I, pending disposal of the Writ petition in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 28122 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the dismissed for default order DT: 05-06-2014 in WPMPNo. 28093 of 2012 in W.P.No.25788 of 2009 in the interest of justice IA NO: 3 OF 2014(WPMP 123576 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. PARTHASARADHY ACHUTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S S.NAGESWARAREDDY 5 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.Nos.22067 & 25788 of 2009 The Court made the following Common Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) There is no appearance for the petitioners today, even though the matters were posted for dismissal. Accordingly, the present Writ Petitions are dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 09.02.2026 MJA 6 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.Nos.22067 & 25788 of 2009 435 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION Nos.: 22067 & 25788/2009 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 09.02.2026 MJA