1 Serial No. 02 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 86 of 2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 Shri. Sandarsing Wahlang Aged 31 years S/o (L) Srip Rani R/o Thangmaw Village, Mairang, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. .…….. Appellant/Accused Person -Vs- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by The Public Prosecutor, Govt. of Meghalaya. 2. Shri. XXX The Complainant/Brother of Victim Sessions Case No. 1 of 2021, Arising out of Mairang P.S. Case No. 17(7)/2020 Through the Investigating Officer of the case, C/o Officer-in-Charge, Mairang Police Station, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. ……… Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Ms. P. Agarwal, Legal Aid Counsel. 2026:MLHC:488-DB 2 For the Respondent(s) : Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl. PP with Mr. E.R. Chyne, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Per W. Diengdoh, (J): JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Heard Ms. P. Agarwal, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 25.03.2025 and related order of sentence dated 20.05.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, West Khasi Hills District, Nongstoin in Sessions Case No. 1 of 2021, whereby, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10(ten) years with fine of ₹ 3000/- (Rupees three thousand) only, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment of 1(one) month for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the IPC. 2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 355 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, since he belongs to a poor family and uneducated background, is not aware of his legal rights to file appeal or to engage a private counsel. As such, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Thereafter, legal 2026:MLHC:488-DB 3 aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted. 3. Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, learned Addl. PP along with Mr. E.R. Chyne, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay. 4. On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 355 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned. 5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week. 6. Misc. Case disposed of. (B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh) Judge Judge 2026:MLHC:488-DB Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.05.20 17:55:09 IST