Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26798 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER BENGALURU MAHANAGARA TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SRI ASHOK N

WP/10470/2025 · 2026-07-08

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34311 WP No. 10470 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 10470 OF 2025 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, BENGALURU MAHANAGARA TRANSPORT CORPORATION (B.M.T.C.), DEPOT NO.18, NORTH EAST ZONE/ DIVISION, CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. HEREIN REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER, B.M.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. ASHOK N., S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NADUVATHI VILLAGE, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU-560 067. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34311 WP No. 10470 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.B.L.Sanjeev., counsel for the petitioner appeared in person. 2. Smt.Manavi.K.M., - the Assistant Law Officer of the BMTC is physically present before the Court and she identifies the respondent as Ashok.N. 3. Counsel for the petitioner and Ashok.N - the respondent jointly submit that they have amicably resolved the matter and have filed a joint memo. They further submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of joint memo. The joint memo reads as under: "Both the parties have agreed to settle the dispute in the following terms and conditions: 1. The Respondent agrees to be reinstated with continuity of service without consequential benefits, without back wages and without interim relief from the date of dismissal till the date of reporting to the work on the basis of memo filed and recorded in final order dt:10/02/2023 in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34311 WP No. 10470 of 2025 W.P.11160/2022. Respondent agrees to forego interim relief (if any) granted in this case. 2. Respondent agrees for postponement of 1 annual increment without cumulative effect for period of 2 years which will be operative from the date of reporting to the work on the basis of memo filed and recorded in final order dt:10/02/2023 in W.P.11160/2022. 3. The Respondent agrees an undertaking that he will not participate or instigate others loyal employees to the strike in future and he will not absent to the duty during the strike period in his service. It is respectfully submitted that both the parties have agreed the above terms and conditions to settle the dispute and the Hon'ble Court may please be dispose the case in terms of the above Joint Memo." 4. When queried by the Court, Ashok.N - the respondent submits that he does not wish to engage any counsel and voluntarily has singed the joint memo. Counsel for the petitioner and Ashok.N submits that they have taken a conscious decision to settle the matter and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling/ modification of the order. 5. The oral submission made by the respective parties and the joint memo is placed on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34311 WP No. 10470 of 2025 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the joint memo. In view of disposal of the Writ Petition in terms of the joint memo, the award dated:04.11.2024 passed by the III Addl. Labor Court, Bengaluru in I.D.No.421/2021 is modified in terms of joint memo. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17