MOHD HANIEF v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME / POLICE)
RP/25/2026 · 2026-08-14
A, Sanjay Parihar
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2678 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2678 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 01 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CM(3292/2026) In RP 25/2026 Mohd Hanief …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. H. Furrahi, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE (Through VC)
ORDER 14.08.2026 CM No. 3292/2026:
01. This is an application seeking condonation of a delay of two days in filing the review petition, seeking review of the order dated 15.04.2026.
02. The application for the reasons stated therein, and considering that the delay of two days is inconsequential, the application is allowed and the delay of two days in filing the review petition is condoned.
03. CM disposed of.
RP No. 25/2026:-
04. Mr. H. Furrahi, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, submits that he had filed this review petition under a misconception that the order of the Director General of Police bearing No. 467 of 2025 dated 06.02.2025 had already been MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 17.08.26
challenged before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench. However, he has now found, from the prayer made before the Tribunal, that the said order was not the subject matter of challenge before the Tribunal.
05. In view of the aforesaid, Mr. H. Furrahi, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, submits that he does not wish to press the present review petition. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Chief Justice (A)
SRINAGAR: 14.08.2026
“Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 17.08.26