KAIRAVIVIEW PVT. LIMITED THRUGH ITS DIRECTOR GAURAV TANEJA v. ANUPMA MALIK, ESTATE OFFICER-II HARYANA SHAHERI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN
COCP/2486/2026 · 2026-07-07
Vikas Suri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26778 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26778 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
COCP-2486-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 07.07.2026
Kairaviview Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner
Versus
Anupma Malik and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioner.
***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)
1.
This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of
order dated 20.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP-34586-2025.
2.
On an advance notice of the petition having been issued, Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents and has filed his power of attorney in Court, which is taken on record. He has also filed compliance report along with copy of speaking order dated 01.07.2026 (Annexure R-1), stated to be passed in deference to the aforesaid order dated 20.11.2025, which is taken on record. A copy thereof stands furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after perusing the order dated 01.07.2026, prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
4.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(VIKAS SURI) July 07, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether Reportable :
Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.08 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment