Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26775 (CAL)

SK NUR KALAM @ NUR KALAM @ SAWEL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1099/2026 · 2026-07-07

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.07.2026 Serial no. 257 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 1099 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Manickchak PS Case No. 704 of 2025 dated 09.09.2025 u/s 103(1)/238/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 , GR Case No. 4608 of 2025. -And- In the matter of : Sk. Nur Kalam @ Nur Kalam @ Sawel … Petitioner(s) Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Kr. Gupta … for the State-respondent(s) The petitioner is in custody since September, 2025 and, although, charge-sheet has been submitted but the case till date has not been committed to court of Sessions. Learned advocate for the State submits that one of the accused persons is absconding. In view of the Section 232 of the BNSS, it is directed that the learned trial court would split up the trial of the case at the earliest and adhere to the present provision. At this stage, considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. The petitioner would renew his prayer for bail at the appropriate stage. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 1099 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)