DHONI KUMAR SINGH @ DHONI SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8845/2026 · 2026-09-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:28595] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8845 of 2026
------
1. Dhoni Kumar Singh @ Dhoni Singh, Aged about 21 Years, Son of- Late Santosh Singh, Resident of New Basti Bagbera, Road No.3, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, District- Singhbhum East.
2. Anmol Singh @ Harprit, Aged about 19 Years, Son of- Bhupendra Singh, Resident of Ganesh Nagar, Road No.1, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, District- Singhbhum East
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Kr. Karmakar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-23-09-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No.55 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 109(1), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners attempted to murder the husband of the informant namely Anoj Sharma. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that that there is no allegation against the petitioners of use of any arms in the alleged occurrence. It is also submitted that the petitioners had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the
case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 18.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No.55 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-23.09.2026-Animesh/