1 CGHC010249492026 2026:CGHC:29242-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3553 of 2026 1 - M/s Shashank Jain Through its Proprietor, Shashank Jain S/o Sunil Jain, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Bhagat Singh Chowk, Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Officer In-Charge, Central Research Laboratory, Public Works Department, Durg Range, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer, Zone No. 2, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - Zone Commissioner Zone No. 2, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate. For State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rakesh Ojha and Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocates. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.07.15 19:23:58 +0530 2 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13 -07-2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief(s): “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the impugned order dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Respondent No.3/Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District – Durg (C.G.) 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner's name in the list of approved contractors and to permit the petitioner to participate in all future tenders. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to refund the forfeited security deposit to the petitioner forthwith. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to complete the remaining 3 work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, without prejudice to the petitioner's rights. 10.5 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed his representation before the authority concerned on 17.06.2026. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 does not dispute the fact the petitioner has filed his representation before the authority concerned and submits that the same would be decided in accordance with law. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for parties, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law against the decision taken by the authority concerned, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil