AJOY KUMAR BHATTACHARJEE v. SMT. MIRA BHATTACHARJEE
FMAT/2096/1988 · 2026-07-07
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Supratim Bhattacharya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26757 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26757 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L.3. July 7, 2026. MNS.
CR 1918 of 1989 in FMAT No. 2096 of 1988
Ajoy Kumar Bhattacharjee Vs. Smt. Mira Bhattacharjee
Mr. Balai Laloo Sahoo, Adv.
… for the appellant.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he has no instruction to appear on behalf of the appellant further.
2. We notice from the order dated June 30, 2026 that none had appeared on behalf of either of the parties on the said date as well.
3. In such view of the matter, it is doubtful as to whether the appellant is willing to proceed with the appeal and the Rule.
4. Accordingly, FMAT No. 2096 of 1988 is dismissed for default.
5. CR 1918 of 1989 is discharged.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. There will be no order as to costs.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)