JYOTI PRASAD ALIAS GOLU @JYOTISH PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8868/2026 · 2026-09-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26754 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26754 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28622 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8868 of 2026
------ Jyoti Prasad @ Golu @ Jyotish Prasad, aged about 40 years, s/o Kapil Dev Saw @ Kapil Dev Prasad, r/o Village-Bariyatu, P.O. & P.S.-Balumath, Dist.-Latehar, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Bandana Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 23.09.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. No. 141 of 2019 arising out of Lawalong P.S. Case No.28 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted one dual sim mobile set and purse containing Rs.1,500/- and some papers of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him on T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph no.11 of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that no witnesses have been examined in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 05 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-IV, Chatra, in connection with S.T. No. 141 of 2019 arising out of Lawalong P.S. Case No.28 of 2013 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
23.09.2026 Gunjan-