Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26752 (AP)

M.Phanidhara Prasad v. K. V. Sagar Babu

CC/407/2015 · 2026-03-09

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010644762015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 407/2015 Between: 1. M.PHANIDHARA PRASAD,, S/O. M.V.ARADHYULU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR ASSISTANT, SRI BRAMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K V SAGAR BABU, Executive Officer, Sri Bramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam, Srisailam, Kurnool District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to try, summon and punish Respondent/Contemnor for willful and deliberate disobedience and committing willful and deliberate contempt towards the orders of this Hon'ble Court dt.01.12.2014 passed in W.P.M.P.No.45493/2014 in W. P. No. 36344/ 2014 by his lordship of Justice Sri R. Kantha Rao and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S RAYALU Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. G RAMANA RAO 2. . The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:407 OF 2015 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 01.12.2014 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.36344 of 2014. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that since the writ petition itself is allowed, the contempt case filed against the interim order dated 01.12.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.36344 of 2014 cannot be enforced. Hence, no further orders are necessary and requested to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 10.03.2026 BSP 16 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.407 of 2015 10.03.2026 BSP