Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26750 (AP)

B Chitti Babu v. M. Satyanarayana

CC/2295/2018 · 2026-03-10

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010650212018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2295/2018 Between: 1. B CHITTI BABU, S/O. SANKAR RAO, AGE 55 YEARS, R/O. 1-20-6, NAZARPET TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. M SATYANARAYANA, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH QUALITY CONTROL CIRCLE, COURT COMPOUND GUNTUR 522 004, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. KHANTAMANENI SHAKUNTALA, COMMISSIONER, TENALI MUNICIPALITY TENALI 522 201, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. MUPPA GANGAIAH, MANAGING PARTNER M/S. SRI SRINIVASA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED 1-2-83, SVN COLONY, GUNTUR 522 001 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI 2. 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Kami Reddy Divya, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents. 2. This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of Interim Order of this Court dated 05.01.2018 in W.P.No.300 of 2018. 3. It transpires from record that the Writ Petition bearing W.P.No.300 of 2018 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 31.10.2018. The Order dated 31.10.2018 is also on record. 4. In view of the dismissal of the Writ Petition, this Court is of the view that no cause survives in this Contempt Case. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:11.03.2026 Vns