IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 Tekram and others State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. issuance of a w respondents from posting any of supervisory control of respondent No. 6; and in the nature of directing the official respondents to take action and inquire into every individual complaint made by each of the petitioners against respondent 6, in accordance with law. 2. taken on record. 3. interfere in the matter, may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, petitioners to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. 4. 5. 6. 08.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Tekram and others Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. RS Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 6 (through V.C.). NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner issuance of a writ in the nature of Prohibition respondents from posting any of the petitioners under the administrative or supervisory control of respondent No. 6; and in the nature of directing the official respondents to take action and inquire into every individual complaint made by each of the petitioners against respondent 6, in accordance with law. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent No. 6 is taken on record. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, petitioners to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesa Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20296-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. RS Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 6 writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for Prohibition prohibiting the official petitioners under the administrative or supervisory control of respondent No. 6; and in the nature of Mandamus directing the official respondents to take action and inquire into every individual complaint made by each of the petitioners against respondent No. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent No. 6 is fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No prohibiting the official petitioners under the administrative or Mandamus directing the official respondents to take action and inquire into every No. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent No. 6 is fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to submits that he the petitioners to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.08 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.