APHC010652052023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33701/2023 Between: 1. PUCHAKAYALA HARIKA, WO BHIMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.L3- 280/LL,SAMPATH APARTMENT, BLOCK NO2,FLAT NO202,TEACHERS COLONY,PENAMULURU,VIJAYAWADA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUIIDINGS, VEIAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, POIICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ,PENAMAIURU PS ,VIJAYAWADA 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMAIURU POIICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 5. BHIMI REDDY SIVA PRASADA REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, AGED 70 YEARS, RETD EMPIOYEE, R/O D.NO.74-12/2-6A, MAIN ROAD, VIJAYAWADA-15. 6. BHIMI REDDY UMA JYOTHI, W/O SIVA PRASAD REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.74-12/2-6A, MAIN ROAD, VIJAYAWADA-15. 7. BHIMI REDDY VAMSI KRISHNA REDDY, S/O SIVA PRASAD REDDY, 2 AGED 35 YEARS, RETD EMPIOYEE, R/O D.NO.L3- 280/LL,SAMPATH APARTMENT,BIOCK NO2,FLAT NO202,TEACHERS COIONY,VIJAYAWADA-7 PRESENTLY ON EMPLOYMENT AT USA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents involving in Matrimonial dispute trying to necked out the petitioner from the matrimonial home D.No. 13-280/1 l,Sampath Apartment,Block No2,Flat No202,Teachers Colony,Vijayawada-7 in the absence of her husband by the Respondents 5 and 6 with the police force of the 3rd respondent pending the complaint filed by petitioner against Respondents 5 and 6 complaining harassment attracting under Sec 498 A IPC is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and voilating of article 21 Constitution of India, voilation of Women Laws and against to Police Laws and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register FIR under Sec 498 A IPC on Petitioner complaint against respondents 5 to 7 and consequently not to involve in matrimonial matters illegally and to necked out the petitioner from herself acquired property by force by directing the respondents 5 and 6 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of petitioners house property and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take departmental action against the 3rd respondent for miss using the Official duties by colluding with the respondents 5 and 6 to disposes the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33701 of 2023 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents involving in Matrimonial dispute trying to necked out the petitioner from the matrimonial home D.No. 13-280/1 l,Sampath Apartment,Block No2,Flat No202,Teachers Colony,Vijayawada-7 in the absence of her husband by the Respondents 5 and 6 with the police force of the 3rd respondent pending the complaint filed by petitioner against Respondents 5 and 6 complaining harassment attracting under Sec 498 A IPC is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and voilating of article 21 Constitution of India, voilation of Women Laws and against to Police Laws and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register FIR under Sec 498 A IPC on Petitioner complaint against respondents 5 to 7 and consequently not to involve in matrimonial matters illegally and to necked out the petitioner from herself acquired property by force by directing the respondents 5 and 6 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of petitioners house property and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take departmental action against the 3rd respondent for miss using the Official duties by colluding with the respondents 5 and 6 to disposes the petitioner.” 2. Heard Sri P. Srinivasulu, learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the police are not registered the FIR on the complaint made by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the police are involving in the matrimonial disputes and harassing the petitioner to settle the matter. 4 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that already a case has been registered against the respondents 5 to 7 on the complaint made by the petitioner. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to not to interfere in the matrimonial disputes, except by following the due process of law. 6. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 331 WRIT PETITION NO: 33701 of 2023 Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK