1 CGHC010248492026 2026:CGHC:29452 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No.991 of 2026 • Akshya Kumar Singh S/o Shri Rajeshwar Singh Aged About 40 Years R/o Shantinagar Dipika Beltikari Basahat P.S. Dipika Tehsil Dipika District Korba C.G. ... Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Dipika District Korba C.G. ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For State/Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, G.A. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 13.07.2026 1. This first anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.210/2026 registered at Police Station Dipika, District Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 64(1), 64(2)(E), 74, 115 & 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that victim lodged a report alleging therein that she and the present applicant both were working in the same company and used to visit in the house of the applicant since, 2015. On 01.01.2016, when victim was alone at her home, applicant Digitally signed by R NIRALA 2 came and made physical relationship with her. Later, on 23.05.2026 applicant again met her and by threatening her that he is having naked video of her, he again established the physical relation with the victim and also assaulted her. Based on above facts present case has been registered. Hence, this bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in crime in question. It is further submitted that victim is a married lady having child. There was a consensual relationship between the applicant and victim and due to some dispute between them, FIR has been filed belatedly with a huge delay of 10 years. The victim also lodged another FIR in another Crime No.205/2026, registered at Police Station Dipka, District Korba (C.G.), therefore, the present applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel for the non-applicant/State, would oppose the bail application of the applicant and submits that the applicant made physical relation with the victim time and again by threatening her of life. He also threatened her to make her obscene photographs viral and the victim due to fear did not disclose the said fact earlier to her family members. It is further submitted that the injury was also found in private part of the victim, as is evident from the medical report, therefore, under the aforesaid circumstances, the applicant may not be enlarged on bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of offence and further considering the medical report of the victim, in which injury was found in private part of the victim, without commenting 3 further anything on merits, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant at this stage. 7. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Nirala