IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 223 Dilpreet Singh @ Manna State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present :- Mr. P.B.S. Goraya, Advocate for the appellant(s) Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The 22.04.2026 passed second application out of FIR No. 111(2), 111(3), 2023, Sections (Prevention) Act, 1908, Section 25(6), of the Aircraft had been dismissed. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the that the case of the to whom concession of vide order dated 3. Learned State Counsel IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-D-863 Date of decision: Dilpreet Singh @ Manna VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. P.B.S. Goraya, Advocate for the appellant(s) Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant appeal has been preferred passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, application for grant of regular bail to No.191 dated 03.12.2024 registered 111(4), 249, 253, 61(2) of the 13, 16, 17, 18, 18-B, 19 & 20 Act, 1967, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the 25(6), 25(7) of the Arms Act 1959 Act, 1934 at Police Station Cantonment, dismissed. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the that the case of the appellant is at par with co-accused concession of regular bail has already vide order dated 06.04.2026 passed in CRA-D-1243 Learned State Counsel does not dispute the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 863-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 07.07.2026 ...Appellant(s) ...Respondent(s) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. P.B.S. Goraya, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. preferred against the order dated Judge, Amritsar, whereby the the appellant in case arising registered under Sections 111(1), the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20 of the Unlawful Activities the Explosives Substance Act, 1959 and Section 10, 11 and 12 Cantonment, District Amritsar, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant contends accused Rajbir Singh @ Raju already been granted by this Court 1243-2025. does not dispute the aforesaid facts. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.07.08 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 223 CRA-D-863-2026(O&M) 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. 5. In view of the facts noticed above and taking into consideration that co-accused Rajbir Singh @ Raju has already been granted the concession of regular bail vide order dated 06.04.2026 passed in CRA-D- 1243-2025, thus with a view to extend parity and keeping the case of the present appellant at par with the said co-accused, we deem it appropriate to enlarge the appellant on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6. The instant appeal is allowed and the appellant is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made clear that the appellant shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) 07.07.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.07.08 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document