Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26743 (CHH)

NIRBHAY KUMAR PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3157/2023 · 2026-07-12

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010215642023 2026:CGHC:29526 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3157 of 2023 1 - Nirbhay Kumar Patel S/o Bharat Kumar Patel Aged About 60 Years R/o House No. 57/4, Village Karwahi, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Deepak Kumar Patel S/o Nirbhay Kumar Patel Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Karwahi, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Govindram Behra S/o Bholaram Behra Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Khamhariya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Radheshaym S/o Kedarnath Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Khamhariya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Akash Nayak S/o Vajan Nayak Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Bajarmuda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Shiv Kumar Patel S/o Govardhan Patel Aged About 69 Years R/o House No. 64, Village Khamhariya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Makardhwaj Nayak S/o Bheem Ram Nayak Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Karwahi, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Jindal Steel And Power Limited Through General Manager, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar Banjare, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Choubey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13.07.2026 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena