HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 519 of 2026 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard Sri R.S. Tomar, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the instant criminal revision has been preferred with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause along with delay condonation application as there is delay of 327 days in filing the revision. The relief mentioned in the prayer clause of the revision is delineated below:- "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this revision and set aside the order dated 03.01.2025 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court No. 1, Meerut in Misc. Case No. 221 of 2025 (Akash Vs. Anuradha) arising out of Case No. 412 of 2021 (Smt. Anuradha Vs. Akash Sonkar) under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Meerut in so far concerned in regard to direction to pay maintenance of Rs. 35,000/- including fine of and Rs. 5000/-Rs. 2,000/-as interim maintenance during the pendency of Case No. 412 of 2021 to the O.P. NO. 2 and stay the effect and operation of the aforesaid order passed by learned Court below during pendency of the present revision before this Hon'ble Court. And/or to pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has challenged the order dated 03.01.2025 by which interim maintenance amount has been Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Deisy Pundir, Rahul Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akash Sonkar .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) granted to the wife of the revisionist/O.P. No.2. He further submits that he does not want to press this revision on merits and he is ready to pay the maintenance amount as directed by Principal Judge, Family Court No.1, Meerut vide order dated 03.01.2025 and the concerned Family Court may be directed to decide the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in a time bound manner. 4. In view of submission of learned counsel for the revisionist that he is not pressing the revision on merits, the delay in filing the revision is hereby condoned. The instant revision is disposed of directing the concerned Family Court to decide the pending application under section 125 Cr.P.C. after affording opportunity of hearing to both the parties, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either parties, preferably within a period of six months from today. May 7, 2026 Manish Himwan CRLRD No. 519 of 2026 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad