Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010228312023
2026:CGHC:29771
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5095 of 2023 1 - Ajay Kumar Ekka S/o. Late Paulus Ekka Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Executive Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, In Front Of Raja Gate, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Anju Chandel W/o Shri Neeraj Singh Aged About 41 Years Presently Working As Executive Engineer, Rural Road Network Management Unit, (A Wing Of Pmgsy) Near St. Mental Hospital, Sendri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vinod Kumar Minj S/o. Late Simon Minj Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Executive Engineer, Project Implementation Unit. I, Boir- Dadar Road, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Service (A Wing Of Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development), Vikas Bhawan, Sector 19, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Manoj Kumar Ratre, Superintendent Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Head Office, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sohan Chandra, Superintendent Engineer, Division Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 5 - Dwarika Prasad Bhuarya, Superintendent Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Project Implementation Unit 2, Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh. 6 - Reenal Mehta, Superintendent Engineer, Rctrc Head Office, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.07.15 10:14:26 +0530
2 For Petitioners : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For Respondents 1 & 2/State : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Siddharth Rathore, Advocate For Respondents 4 to 6 : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Order on Board 14.07.2026
1. The petitioners have preferred instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief(s):-
“10.1 Call for records of the DPC proceedings as also the ACRs of the respondents concerned herein from the possession of the respondents for kind perusal and appreciation of the grievance of the petitioners herein. 10.2 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and quash order dated 25.04.2023 (Annexure P/1), whereby the private respondents herein holding lower or junior positions to the petitioners in the gradation list for the post of Executive Engineer as on 01.04.2022 have been promoted to that of Superintendent Engineer surpassing them in a most arbitrary and illegal manner. 10.3 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and direct the respondents to hold a review DPC as on 03.04.2023 for promotion from the post of Executive Engineer to that of Superintendent Engineer considering the remarks made in the ACR with a pragmatic approach uniformly for all in view of the period of pandemic having passed by in between in view of the application of criteria of rit-cum-seniority' for such promotion. 10.4 Grant any other relief, which is deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has become infructuous as promotion has already been granted to the petitioners.
3
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents also conceded above submission.
4. In view of the above submission, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Judge Bini