ROHIT LOHRA @ ROHIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5871/2026 · 2026-09-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26736 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26736 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28531 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5871 of 2026
------ Rohit Lohra @ Rohit Kumar, aged about 20 years, so of Jivan Lohra @ Bhagru Lohra, resident of village-Chhapar, 7 No.Colony, Chhapar Panchayat, P.O.-Binja, P.S.-Budamu, District-Ranchi.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate
: Ms. Sarita Kumari, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.06 Dated- 21-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.385 of 2025 arising out of Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 12 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons has committed murder of Rajendra Kumar Oraon. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Diwakar Ganjhu @ Pratap Ji @ Bullu. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.07.2025 as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that no witness has been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Hazaribagh in connection with S.T. Case No.385 of 2025 arising out of Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 12 of 2023 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 21/09/2026 Abhiraj/