IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17279 of 2026 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 5th October, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.17279 of 2026 Subhash Chand and another …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.17330 of 2026 Ganesh Dutt and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.17331 of 2026 Geeta Devi and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Mokta, Mr. Sameer Miyan and Mr. Saurav, Advocates, in the respective petitions. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocates General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations (Annexure P-2 in all the writ petitions) seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide 2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025 3 the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 05, 2026 Judge Mukesh