Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2673 (JHR)

AKASH KUMAR MISHRA ALIAS POGO MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1077/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9245 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1077 of 2026 ------ Akash Kumar Mishra @ Pogo Mishra, son of Manoj Kumar Mishra, resident of Qr. No.Dt.2016, Tanki Side, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 02/01.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhurwa (Hatia) P.S. Case No. 331 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 61 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happens to be an Advocate Clerk of the High Court and while he was going for lunch, he saw the son of the informant in an injured condition and he has taken him to Paras Hospital for treatment and informed the informant about the incident and thereafter, the father of the injured has also implicated the petitioner in the present case. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are of making injury on the body of son of the informant. 5. From perusal of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations of assault on the son of the informant. It has been pointed out that the petitioner has taken the injured to Paras Hospital for treatment and he has also informed the informant, and in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 04.04.2026