Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26729 (AP)

P. VENKATA RAMI REDDY v. PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS

CC/3713/2025 · 2026-03-29

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010646402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3713/2025 Between: 1. P. VENKATA RAMI REDDY, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE CHINNA MALLA REDDY, D.N0.25/117-B, SANJEEVANAGAR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. G SAI PRASAD IAS, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. BALA CHANDRA REDDY, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. E PRATHAP, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, K C CANAL DIVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. B RAVI KUMAR, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KC SUB-DIVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the Respondents herein and punish the Respondents under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court dated 17-04-2025 in WP.No.26160 of 2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following 3 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order, dated 17.04.2025, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.26160 of 2024, is duly complied with by the respondents and no further orders are required to be passed in this Contempt Case. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.03.2026 DSH