JASLEEN KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/25207/2026 · 2026-07-07
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26728 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26728 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-25207-2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
322
CRM-M-25207-2026
Date of decision: 7th July, 2026 Jasleen Kaur and another ...Petitioners Versus
State of Punjab and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Kishan Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Durgesh Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Deman Baghla, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***
MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):-
The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No. 36 dated 05.02.2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 05.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gidderbaha and got their statements PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.08 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-25207-2026 -2-
recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 15.06.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 36 dated 05.02.2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 01.04.2026(Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. [MANISHA BATRA]
JUDGE 7th July, 2026 Parveen Sharma
1.
Whether speaking/ reasoned
: Yes / No
2. Whether reportable
: Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.08 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document