SMT M SUSHEELAMMA v. INDIRANAGAR SPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED
WP/16767/2026 · 2026-07-06
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26728 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26728 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33849 WP No. 16767 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 16767 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT M.SUSHEELAMMA W/O.LATE SRI.D.RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, HAVING RESIDENCE AT NO.67, LAKSHMI KRUPA WIND TUNNEL ROAD, MURUGESHPALYA, BANGALORE-560 017
2. SMT.DEEPTHI.R, D/O.LATE SRI.D.RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, HAVING RESIDENCE AT NO.67, LAKSHMI KRUPA WIND TUNNEL ROAD, MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALORE-560 017
3. SRI.R.RAJEEV, S/O.LATESRI.D.RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HAVING RESIDENCE AT NO.67, LAKSHMI KRUPA WIND TUNNEL ROAD, MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALORE-560 017 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DILEEP C.G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
INDIRANAGAR SPORTS
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33849 WP No. 16767 of 2026
PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.122, SIPANI CLASS 2, FLAT NO. 402, 1ST A CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALORE-560 095 REPRESENTED HEREIN THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ANURAG BARMECHA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.DEEPAK BHASKAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN COM. OS NO. 1012/2023 BY THE HONBLE LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH-85) AND TO SET ASIDE THE DISMISSAL
ORDER UNDER ANNX-A PASSED ON IA NO. 13 AND IA NO. 14 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC AND ALSO UNDER ORDER 18 RULE 17 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC DATED 24.04.2026 BY DISMISSING THE SAME.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER Aggrieved by the order dated 24.04.2026 passed in I.A.Nos.13 and 14 in Com.O.S.No.1012/2023, whereby the Commercial Court has rejected the application, the petitioners are before this Court.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33849 WP No. 16767 of 2026
2. It is submitted that after the unregistered lease Deed was marked, he had no opportunity to cross-examine the witness and the Commercial Court, without considering the application, dismissed the same.
3.
Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection to allow these applications, provided the petitioners complete the further cross-examination of PW.1 within a day.
4. Considering the submissions of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER i. The
order dated 24.04.2026 in Com.O.S.No.1012/2023 is set aside and consequently, I.A.Nos.13 and 14 are allowed. ii. It is submitted that the matter is coming up on 08.07.2026. On that day, the petitioner shall conclude the cross-examination of PW.1 and the Commercial Court shall not grant any further time.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33849 WP No. 16767 of 2026
iii. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. iv. All pending I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52