Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26727 (CAL)

SUKUMAR PAUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

FMA/36/2026 · 2026-07-07

Shampa Sarkar, Smita Das De

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.07.2026 SL No.38 Court No.12 (gc) FMA 36 of 2026 Sukumar Paul Vs. The State of the West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Malay Bhattacharya, Mr. Subhrajyoti Ghosh, …for the Appellant. Mr. D.N. Roy, Ld. G.P. Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, A.G.P., Mr. Sourav Halder …for the State. 1. There is no scope to interfere with the impugned order. 2. The learned Judge was correct in holding that the remedy of the appellant was in a contempt application and not by way of a second writ petition on the self-same issue, when a Single Judge had already disposed of the writ petition of the appellant by passing directions on the Municipality. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 4. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 5. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)