Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26725 (KAR)

SRI B K MANJUNATH v. THE STATE OF KARNTAKA

WP/17001/2026 · 2026-07-06

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33797 WP No. 17001 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 17001 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. B.K. MANJUNATH S/O B.M. KRISHNAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/A NO. 30/2, JAYAKRISHNA NILAYA, OPP 10TH CROSS, BAGALAGUNTE, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 073. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR T.L, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNTAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER YELAHANKA SUB DIVISION, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33797 WP No. 17001 of 2026 4. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS (ADLR), BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, CAMPUS, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DATED 02.03.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-E WITHIN TWO WEEKS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is seeking direction to respondents to conduct Phodi and Durasth and to issue 11E sketch in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33797 WP No. 17001 of 2026 respect of land in question, which has not been done till date. 3. Taking into consideration, the notice has been already issued as per Annexure-B, I am of the view that the respondents-authorities shall complete entire proceedings within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. With this observation, writ petition is accordingly disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19