Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26715 (KAR)

SRI. SRINIVAS K C v. STATE BY VISHVESHWARAPURAM POLICE STATION.,

WP/29879/2025 · 2026-07-06

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33817 WP No. 29879 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 29879 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI SRINIVAS K C, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. CHANDRASHEKARA D, R/O. KUDLI VILLAGE AND POST, SHIMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT, SHIMOGGA-577227. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KRISHNA S VYAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY VISHVESHWARAPURAM POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE HIGH COURT GOVT. PLEADER, AG OFFICE, HIGH COURT, BENGALURU-560001. 2. SRI PRASANNA KUMAR T S, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O. TR SHYAM BHATT, R/O. NO.494, SHIRADAR KRUPA, SHANTHI NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577202. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R-1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W U/S. 528 OF THE BNSS, 2024 PRAYING TO-I. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33817 WP No. 29879 of 2025 DIRECTION, CALLING FOR THE RECORDS RELATING TO CRIME NO.122/2023 OF VISHVESHWARAPURAM SUB-DIVISION POLICE STATION, NOW REGISTERED AS C.C. NO. 6025/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE 37TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU, AND QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET DATED 23/12/2024 FILED THEREIN FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 506, 120B AND 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-C IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO THE PETITIONER (ACCUSED NO.6) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on eleven occasions. 2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed, for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 125