Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26715 (HP)

RAJ RAJEEV SOOD v. BUDHI SINGH CHAUHAN

EX.P/23/2016 · 2026-10-05

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.23 of 2016 Date of Decision: 05.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Rajeev Sood & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus Budhi Singh Chauhan … Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Banta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate (through Video Conferencing) & Mr. S. Partha Swami, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner, fairly states that decree stands fully satisfied and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. Needless to say, on account of execution of judgment/decree sought to be executed in the instant proceedings, entries made in the revenue record qua attachment of the property in the Civil Suit No. 114 of 2012 shall be removed and the property shall be released. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October 05, 2026 (sunil) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?