Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26698 (JHR)

MS PANEM COAL MINES LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY BARUN KUMAR GHOSH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

LPA/198/2022 · 2026-09-28

Manoj Prasad

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Letters Patent Appellate Jurisdiction) L.P.A No. 198 of 2022 ------- M/s Panem Coal Mines Limited, registered office at, 6 Purbi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-110057 and having its branch office at Amrapara, District-Pakur (Jharkhand) through its authorized Signatory Barun Kumar Ghosh, Aged about 59 years, s/o late Amrendra Kumar Ghosh, r/o 5B, Nandalal Basu Sarani, PO & PS- Nandalal Basu Sarani, District-Kolkata (West Bengal) … Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkahnd. 2. Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, through its Secretary, PO & PS-Doranda, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. Certificate Officer Mines-cum-Deputy Director, Santhal Pargans Circle, Dumka, PO & PS-Dungra, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 4. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Head Office at the Mall, Patiala-147001, PO & PS-Patiala, District-Punjab. ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY For the Appellant : None For the Respondent-State : Mr. Mohan Kr. Dubey, AC to AG -------- Order No.4/Dated: 14 th August 2023 M/s Panem Coal Mines Limited is aggrieved by the order dated 6th April 2022 by which W.P.(C) No. 5512 of 2019 has been dismissed on the ground that it has an efficacious alternative remedy under section 60 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914. 2. This Letters Patent Appeal was filed on 12th May 2022 with as many as 14 defects however since then the appellant has not cared to remove the defects and prosecute the present Letters Patent Appeal. 3. Not only that, a certified copy of the writ Court's order has not been produced along with the present Letters Patent Appeal. 4. We have waited for more than 10 minutes going through 2 L.P.A No. 198 of 2022 the records of the present Letters Patent Appeal but no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. 5. This Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Amit