IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 311 of 2008 Decided on : 07.10.2026 Rajinder Kumar & another ....Appellant Versus Madan Gopal ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the appellant. : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Today, parties have appeared in the Court and they have stated that they have entered into compromise voluntarily. Their respective statements have been recorded separately. The compromise is contained in CMP No. 24523 of 2026. They have put their signatures respectively on compromise. They acknowledge the correctness of the compromise and they have no objection in case the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. They have further agreed that existing paths will remain common and will be used by both the parties without any interruption. 2. In view of above, the present appeal stands disposed of in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The 2 judgments and decrees passed by the learned Courts below stand modified accordingly. The application and the terms and conditions of the compromise shall form part of the decree. 3. Pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 07th October, 2026 (ravinder)