Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26693 (JHR)

MD. SARUF GADDI @ MD. SHAROOF GADDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8911/2026 · 2026-09-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:28830] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8911 of 2026 ------ Md. Saruf Gaddi @ Md. Sharoof Gaddi, S/o Md. Samiullah, Age- 29 yrs, R/o 18, Gwala Toli, G. M. Gaddi Academy, PS. – Hindpiri, Post – GPO, Ranchi, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrit Kr. Singh, Advocate Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-24-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with G.R. Case No. 2244 of 2026 arising out of Doranda P.S. Case No. 109 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 305 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of jewelleries and cash. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his own confessional statement made in Doranda P.S. Case No. 121 of 2026 and charge sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.06.2026 as mentioned in para-7 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 16.09.2026 passed in B.A. No.8622 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with G.R. Case No. 2244 of 2026 arising out of Doranda P.S. Case No. 109 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 24.09.2026 Saroj/