IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17535/2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rikki Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation at Annexure P-7 seeking applicability of Vijay Parmar & Ors. Versus State of H.P.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/ competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a time bound manner. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 9321/2025, decided on 06.04.2026 2 Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 07th October, 2026 rohit