Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2669 (RAJ)

SUNIL @ NANU S/O KALURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4503/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16961] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4503/2026 Sunil @ Nanu S/o Kaluram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Murli Johadi, Tan Divrala, Police Station Ajitgarh, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Neemkathana, District Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarthak Choubey Mr. Ajeet Singh Devanda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 22/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 309/2025 registered at Police Station Sri Madhopur, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(2), 316(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023, in which charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that main allegations are against the co-accused- Omprakash. He further submits that there are no criminal cases pending against the accused-petitioner and he is in custody since February, 2026; conclusion of trial will take its own time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the [2026:RJ-JP:16961] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4503/2026] bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the main allegations are against the co-accused- Omprakash. The accused-petitioner is in custody since February, 2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sunil @ Nanu S/o Kaluram is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/24