SATI SRIDHARA SURYA SARVANI v. SATHI GOWTHAM REDDY
TRCMP/404/2025 · 2026-01-05
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26684 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26684 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010649172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 404/2025 Between: 1.SATI SRIDHARA SURYA SARVANI, W/O.GOWTHAM REDDY, D/O.GOLUGURI SUBHAKARA REDDY AGED 34 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. G. MAMIDADA, EAST GODAVARI DT. ANDHRA PRADESH-533344. ...PETITIONER AND 1.SATHI GOWTHAM REDDY, S/o. Ammi Reddy Aged 36 Years, R/o. D.No.2-8, Devi Center, Polamuru Village Anaparthi Mandal E.G.Dist.
A.P - 533401. ...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased topleased to withdraw H.M.O.P. No. 81 of 2022 from the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District, and transfer it to the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, for disposal in accordance 0 with law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further Proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.81/2022 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District pending disposal of the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.MEDAPATI RAMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1.PATHURI SRINIVAS The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.404 of 2025
ORDER: Today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on both sides is present.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and he has also endorsed the same on the grounds in the bundle to that effect.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.06.01.2026 CVD