( 2026:JHHC:28717 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 4751 of 2026 ---- Vimleshwar Yadav, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Bhuneshwar Yadav, resident of Village- Nonia, PO Bhairoganj, P.S- Chandan, District- Banka. .......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, District, Ranchi 2. Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O P. S, District-Deoghar 3. District Panchayat Raj Officer, Deoghar, P.O P. S, District- Deoghar .....Respondent(s) --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-II --- 06/ Dated: 23.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: "i. For grant of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or an order or a direction commanding upon the respondents to pay the unpaid revised pension and other due lateral benefits of his father legally payable to his mother with interest @10% pa from the date of due till actual payment within specified period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application, as such, she submits that this case may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent for redressal of his grievance 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner may be directed to approach the ( 2026:JHHC:28717 ) concerned respondent by filing a fresh representation, who shall look into the matter so that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2 to look into the grievance of the petitioner by treating this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations and also in light of Annexure-2 appended to this writ application, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner, and if the order is passed in favour of the petitioner, the consequential benefits be granted within a further period of 2 weeks. The petitioner may serve a copy of this writ application along with the relevant documents to the concerned respondent for convenience. 6. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 23.09.2026 Abha/-