122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18166-2026 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 Dharmender Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Mohd. Tarif, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on their respective posts from their initial dates of appointments with all consequential benefits including continuity of service, seniority, pay fixation and arrears of salary. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, at this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case they are permitted to make a fresh representation before respondent No.4, raising the grievance as has been raised in the present petition and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period in light of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo Vs. Union of India Ors, SLP(C)-5580-2024 decided on 20.12.2024. All relevant particulars of the applicants’ service which entitle them to the claimed benefits will be mentioned therein. NEHA 2026.07.08 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-18166-2026 -2- 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioners within four weeks from today, the same will be decide by respondent No.4-The Director General of Higher Education, by passing a speaking order thereupon in accordance with law taking into consideration the judgment in Jaggo’s case (supra) within a period of six months of receiving the representation. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners have no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. The present writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 7. In case, the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.08 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh