Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26673 (AP)

Badiga Venkata Nancharaiah v. Vissarnsetti Vijayalakshrni

CRP/4409/2017 · 2026-03-10

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010642912017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4409/2017 Between: 1. BADIGA VENKATA NANCHARAIAH,, S/O. BADIGA JAGANNADA RAO AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 1ST WARD, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VISSARNSETTI VIJAYALAKSHRNI, W/O. BAPAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.17-115, RADHAM BAZAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SRIRAM CHIT FUNDS PVT LTD, CHALLAPALLI BRANCH, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, CHALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. NOT NECESSARY PARTY ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the order dt. 19/07/2017 passed in IA.No.235 of 2013 in OS.No.57 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, Krishna Dist 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 5789 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings order dated 19.07.2017 passed in I.A.No.235 of 2013 in O.S.No.57 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B S N NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4409 2017 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri B.S.N.Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main suit itself was disposed on 02.04.2025 and as such, the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 11.03.2026 PSA