Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2667 (RAJ)

LOKESH YADAV v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CRLMP/2272/2018 · 2026-04-07

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14417] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1617/2018 Smt. Dhanvati Devi W/o Shri Jaswant Singh R/o Plot No.58 Devi Nagar Extension, Harnathpura, Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through PP. 2. Inderjeet Singh S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh, R/o 339, Hanuman Nagar Vistar, Sirsi Road, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Raj., At Present Deputy Commissioner Ayojna, Nagar Nigam, H.Q. Lal Kothi, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2272/2018 Lokesh Yadav S/o Shri Jaswant Singh, R/o Plot No. 58, Devi Nagar Extension, Harnathpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Inderjeet Singh S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh, R/o 339, Hanuman Nagar Vistar, Sirsi Road, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Raj., At Present Deputy Commissioner Ayojna, Nagar Nigam, H.Q. Lal Kothi, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP Mr. K.C. Rawat for Ms. Naina Saraf JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/04/2026 1. Instant petition has been preferred for quashing the impugned FIR No. 50/2018 registered with the Police Station Jyoti [2026:RJ-JP:14417] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1617/2018] Nagar, Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B IPC. 2. An interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner on 05.04.2018, by which further proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR have been stayed, since then every time the case has been deferred for one reason or another and in the meantime, eight years have passed. Today also, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier order sheets dated 29.08.2024, 17.05.2019 and 20.04.2018 indicates that none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the said occasions. The present petition is lying pending since the year 2018. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed accordingly. 5. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Investigating Officer to proceed with the pending investigation. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/54-55