Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26667 (CHH)

RIKESHWAR GANGBER v. DEEPAK SAHU

MAC/629/2022 · 2026-07-12

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010167442022 2026:CGHC:29491 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 629 of 2022 Rikeshwar Gangber S/o Shravan Gangber Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Dodkawahi (Patharripara), Post Sahawada, Chowki Halba, Tahsil Charama, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Deepak Sahu S/o Goku Ram Sahu, Aged About 26 Years R/o Green Chowk, Gayatri Ward No. 25, Police Station Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Kumudani Dhurandhar S/o Keshav Chandra, R/o 476 Ward No. 42, B.S. Gurukul Kirana Store, Subhash Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of The Offending Vehicle) 3 - New India Insurance Company Limited, Division Office, Akshwani Road, Gandhinagar, Ward, Near M.M. Towar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of The Offending Vehicle) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 13/07/2026 1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the impugned award dated 18.02.2022 BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.07.14 13:22:11 +0530 2 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, North Bastar Kanker, CG in Motor Accident Claim Case No.26/2020. 2. On the previous dates of hearing, i.e., 25.03.2026 & 24.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. 3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellant, which shows that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. 4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai