Bh. Syam Prasad v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary
WP/15010/2016 · 2026-01-22
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26663 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26663 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010646262016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15010/2016 Between:
1. BH. SYAM PRASAD, S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS (UNDER SUSPENSION) R/O. MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD & AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AP BLOCK, HYDERABAD.
2. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP CENTRAL BANK LTD, MACHILIPATNAM, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT.
3. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP BANK LTD, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to Declare the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in passing impugned notice dated: 22-042016 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of service rules, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India, and set aside the same, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A RAJENDRA BABU
2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The court made the following ORDER:-
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Rama Sarma, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that subsequent to the issuance of impugned show cause notice, which is in challenge in the writ petition, have issued impugned notice and the same was challenging by way of another writ petition No.21846 of 20017. Hence, he submits that the present writ petition becomes infructuous.
Recording the above said submissions, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.01.2026 GVK
3
58
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.15010 of 2016
Date: 23.01.2026
GVK