Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26658 (CHH)

KAMAL KALWANI v. JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

WPT/46/2023 · 2026-07-13

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010063312023 2026:CGHC:29790 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 44 of 2023 1 - Subhash Dayalani S/o Shri Sanmukhdas Dayalani Aged About 37 Years R/o Sidhi Colony Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Proprietor Of M/s Acme Plastic Indstries, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Joint Commissioner (Appeals) State Tax, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Assistant Commissioner State Tax (Gst), Circle-2, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WITH WPT No. 53 of 2023 1 - Mr. Kamal Kalwani S/o Late Shri Rajpal Kalwani Aged About 50 Years R/o Karbala Road, Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Proprietor Of M/s Ujala Rubber Industries ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Joint Commissioner (Appeals) State Tax, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Assistant Commissioner State Tax (Gst), Circle-2, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WITH WPT No. 46 of 2023 1 - Kamal Kalwani S/o Late Shri Rajpal Kalwani Aged About 50 Years R/o Karbala Road, Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Proprietor Of M/s Ujala Rubber Industries ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Joint Commissioner (Appeals) State Tax, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Assistant Commissioner State Tax (Gst), Circle-2, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.07.14 17:22:37 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Anuradha Jain, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 14.7.2026 1) At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prays that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer respective appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal, as the said Tribunal is now functional. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the said prayer. 3) Permission granted. 4) Accordingly, these writ petitions are hereby disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners to prefer respective appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal within a period of 30 days from today, along with application for grant of stay and the interim relief granted by this Court shall continue to operate till disposal of application for grant of stay. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a