Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26656 (CHH)

ANJU GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/376/2026 · 2026-07-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010246702026 2026:CGHC:28831-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 376 of 2026 Anju Gupta D/o Late Narayan Prasad Gupta Aged About 57 Years R/o Swami Atmanand Ward No.15, Karbala Para G.E. Road, Raipur P.S. Sarswati Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Superintendent Of Police (Rural) Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Officer In Charge Police Station Aarang District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Ishwar Chandrakar S/o Om Prakash Chandrakar Aged About 26 Years R/o Purani Basti Rawanbhatha Mahasamund Thana And District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Uttam Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 10.07.2026 MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.07.13 10:57:36 +0530 2 1. Heard Mr. Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate for respondents / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the office of respondents by issuing a writ of certiorari for kind perusal and, 10.2 After perusal of record may kindly be pleased to command the respondents and further be pleased to direct the R/2 to break open the lock after due observance of procedure and hand it over the possession to the petitioner. 10.3 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and appropriate in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.” 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to law. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet