Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26655 (PNJ)

SAJID ALI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHERS

CWP/15979/2026 · 2026-07-06

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15979-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 SAJID ALI STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Arun Dog TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, respondents no.159813745302 at Ground Floor 1A 268, NIT New Township, Neelam Bata Road, Faridabad Haryana. 2. Learned counsel for the second respondent Bank has filed file. Referring to the same transactions in the petitioner’s account National Cyber involving this petitioner’s account is 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Arun Dogra, Advocate for respondent no.2 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia to de-freeze/operationalise 159813745302 with the respondent - IndusInd Bank at Ground Floor 1A 268, NIT New Township, Neelam Bata Road, Faridabad Learned counsel for the second respondent filed a short reply, dated 04.07.2026 Referring to the same, he submitted that the transactions in the petitioner’s account; instructions were Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (NCRP) s account. And total fraudulent petitioner’s account is ₹2,600. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15979-2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. respondent no.2. inter alia, seeking a direction to the freeze/operationalise the petitioner’s account IndusInd Bank Limited in its Branch at Ground Floor 1A 268, NIT New Township, Neelam Bata Road, Faridabad, Learned counsel for the second respondent - Manager of the , dated 04.07.2026, which is retained on the case , he submitted that there were some objectionable ; instructions were received from the (NCRP) regarding UPI related frauds total fraudulent amount transacted in the irection to the the petitioner’s account in its Branch , Manager of the , which is retained on the case some objectionable the related frauds in the AMAN DUA 2026.07.07 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-15979-202 3. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Bank objectionable amount 4. In respondents to account and make the account carried out within a week of receiving 06.07.2026 Ad 2026 -2- In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits the Bank can operationalise the accou objectionable amount only. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents to mark a lien over an amount of account and make the account operational otherwise carried out within a week of receiving a certified copy of th Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits unt by marking a lien on the view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the an amount of ₹2,600 in the petitioner’s operational otherwise. The direction shall be certified copy of this order. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits e view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the in the petitioner’s The direction shall be ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.07 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document