[2026:JHHC:28220] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7896 of 2026 ------ Ashfaque Ahmad @ Ballu, aged about 42 years, Son of Mahammad Shafique Resident of Islam Nagar Kapali, P.O. – Kapali, P.S. – Chandil, Dist- Seraikella Kharsawan .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sourav Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Md. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-17-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 308(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has attempted to murder the informant and his brother by firing upon them and caused injuries by hitting on the head of the informant with the butt of the pistol. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the allegation of hitting the head of the informant with the butt of the pistol is upon an unknown person but the petitioner is named in the FIR. It is also submitted that no gunshot injury has been sustained by anyone else. It is next submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.06.2026 as mentioned in para- 10 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Chandil in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-17.09.2026 Saroj/